Care utilization in eating disorders: for whom are multiple episodes of care more likely?

Date:

Journal: Eating and weight disorders : EWD

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-022-01491-7

Authors:
Daniel Le Grange, PhD, FAEDDan V. Blalock, PhDAlan Duffy, MSPhilip S. Mehler, MD, FACP, FAED, CEDSCraig Johnson, PhD, CEDS, FAEDJamie Manwaring, PhDSusan McClanahan, PhD, CEDSRenee D. Rienecke, PhD, FAED

  • Binge Eating Disorder
  • Depressive Disorders

Purpose

The current study aimed to determine baseline clinical features among adults receiving varied levels of care for transdiagnostic eating disorders (N = 5206, 89.9% female, mean age 29 years old) that may be associated with increased care utilization.

Methods

We used negative binomial regression models to evaluate associations among eating disorder diagnoses, other psychiatric features (e.g., lifetime history of comorbid disorders), and the number of episodes of care for treatment of the eating disorder.

Results

Having a diagnosis of binge eating disorder (p < .001) or avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (p = .04) were associated with lower odds of readmissions. A lifetime diagnosis of major depressive disorder (p < .001) or self-injury (p < .001) was each associated with significantly higher odds of readmissions.

Conclusions

Care utilization may differ according to eating disorder diagnosis, with a likelihood of increased readmission for those with a history of mood disorder or self-injury. Identification of individuals with greater vulnerability for eating disorder care utilization holds potential in aiding treatment and discharge planning, and development.

Level of evidence

Level III: evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case–control analytic studies.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-022-01491-7

Eating Recovery Center is accredited through the Joint Commission. This organization seeks to enhance the lives of the persons served in healthcare settings through a consultative accreditation process emphasizing quality, value and optimal outcomes of services.

Organizations that earn the Gold Seal of Approval™ have met or exceeded The Joint Commission’s rigorous performance standards to obtain this distinctive and internationally recognized accreditation. Learn more about this accreditation here.