Adverse childhood experiences among a treatment-seeking sample of adults with eating disorders

Date:

Journal: European eating disorders review

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2880

Authors:
Renee D. Rienecke, PhD, FAEDCraig Johnson, PhD, CEDS, FAEDPhilip S. Mehler, MD, FACP, FAED, CEDSDaniel Le Grange, PhD, FAEDJamie Manwaring, PhDAlan Duffy, MSSusan McClanahan, PhD, CEDSDan V. Blalock, PhD

  • Eating Disorders

Objective

The purpose of the current study was to examine the prevalence of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) among adults with eating disorders (EDs), to assess whether experiencing a greater number of ACEs is associated with more severe ED psychopathology, and to determine whether ACEs predict treatment outcome.

Method

Participants were 1819 patients (88.5% female, ages 18–72) admitted to one of two treatment facilities at inpatient, residential, or partial hospitalisation levels of care. The Adverse Childhood Experiences Survey and the Eating Pathology Symptom Inventory (EPSI) were completed at admission and the EPSI at discharge.

Results

Female patients reported higher ACEs than males (p = 0.03), and all diagnoses except avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder had significantly higher ACEs than patients with anorexia nervosa-restricting type (AN-R) (p's < 0.01). Across diagnoses, higher ACEs were associated with decreases in binge eating scores during treatment, but were not associated with changes in purging or restricting. Within diagnoses, higher ACEs scores were associated with decreases in purging for patients with AN-R and increases in purging for patients with binge eating disorder.

Conclusions

Results partially supported the hypothesis that higher ACEs would be associated with more severe ED psychopathology.

https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2880

Eating Recovery Center is accredited through the Joint Commission. This organization seeks to enhance the lives of the persons served in healthcare settings through a consultative accreditation process emphasizing quality, value and optimal outcomes of services.

Organizations that earn the Gold Seal of Approval™ have met or exceeded The Joint Commission’s rigorous performance standards to obtain this distinctive and internationally recognized accreditation. Learn more about this accreditation here.